Columns
10 years on Image

10 years on

Melbourne Water moving to Docklands
Read more >>

Away from the desk Image

Away from the desk

The little bent tree
Read more >>

Chamber update Image

Chamber update

COVID-19 and Docklands businesses
Read more >>

Docklander Image

Docklander

A staunch Docklander
Read more >>

Docklands Secrets Image

Docklands Secrets

Conflicting speeds
Read more >>

Chinese

墨尔本市长工作寄语
Read more >>

Owners' Corporation Management

Performance-based alternative solutions the key to cheaper cladding replacement costs
Read more >>

Fashion Image

Fashion

Top five street style trends
Read more >>

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Don’t let working from home compromise your health and wellbeing
Read more >>

Letters Image

Letters

Bring on the lasers
Read more >>

Business Image

Business

Something fishy from The Espressionist
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

Social distancing in apartment blocks is hard to do, but necessary right now
Read more >>

Maritime

Tyranny of distance?
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Full of Beans!
Read more >>

SkyPad Living Image

SkyPad Living

OC support in a time of COVID-19 - a tale of two cities …
Read more >>

Street Art Image

Street Art

Goodbye from Blender Studios
Read more >>

Sustainability

How fast is fast fashion?
Read more >>

The District

Eat your way through our most delicious hot spots
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Microorganism dismantles Airbnb - will it ever recover?
Read more >>

Abby's Angle  Image

Abby's Angle

The world is a battlefield. Fight, but without exception, choose kindness
Read more >>

Editions

Builders still exempt from cladding bills

02 Jul 2019

By Meg Hill

A second VCAT ruling on the Lacrosse fire has reinforced builder exemption from flammable cladding and fire damage.

The first ruling, in February, approved the owners’ claims for damages – $5.7 million – and found the builder, LU Simon, technically liable. But the judgement apportioned 97 per cent of damages to be paid by the architects, surveyors and engineers.

In April, VCAT ruled in favour of the owners’ claims for interest on their loan to fund rectification works and ordered the third parties to pay 100 per cent of it.

They were also ordered to pay LU Simon’s legal fees.

Strata lawyer Tom Bacon said it was an “unusual outcome”.

“The plaintiff (the Owners’ Corporation) is awarded its costs and damages, and the first defendant (LU Simon) is awarded its costs, to be paid by the second, third and fourth defendants,” he said.

“The lesson from this case is that if the builder can prove they built the building in accordance with the plans provided to them, then those who design and certify these buildings that end up being defective will bear primary responsibility.”

In 2014, the Lacrosse building caught fire due to noncompliant and flammable cladding. Since then the cladding has been found to be prevalent in Australian cities, despite being noncompliant.

The Lacrosse VCAT ruling was closely followed as the first case to apportion liability between different parties involved in planning, approving and constructing those buildings.

Apartment owners had been fighting the notion that they should pay for the rectification themselves since the Lacrosse fire, while builders, engineers, architects and surveyors played a blame game.

In October last year the state government introduced a cladding rectification agreement (CRA) scheme to incentivise owners paying for replacements by offering low-interest loans.

But sister publication CBD News revealed this month that not one CRA loan has been granted in Victoria to date.

A 2018 cladding audit identified 354 low/moderate-risk buildings and 275 high/extreme risk buildings in Victoria. The Victorian Building Authority (VBA) continues its audit, having completed over 1000 in the 2018/19 financial year.

It comes amid new modelling released by researhcers from RMIT University in June, which estimated the current cost to replace dangerous cladding on buildings in Victoria at more than $1.6 billion. This figure doesn’t include buildings yet to be audited by the VBA.

Premier Daniel Andrews told 774 ABC Melbourne on June 25 that public money would be used as part of a package of cladding rectification reforms to be announced in July.

It is understood that the government will also establish a new agency Cladding Safety Victoria, which will provide the community with a one-stop-shop for advice and assistance on removing dangerous cladding.

Share on Facebook

Stay in touch with Docklands. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Docklands News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.