10 years on Image

10 years on

Melbourne Water moving to Docklands

Away from the desk Image

Away from the desk

The little bent tree

Chamber update Image

Chamber update

COVID-19 and the Chamber’s response

Docklander Image


Empowering women locally and abroad

Docklands Secrets Image

Docklands Secrets

Conflicting speeds



Fashion Image


Top five street style trends

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Five strategies to get through coronavirus (COVID-19)

Letters Image


Bring on the lasers

Business Image


New offerings at The District Docklands Market Lane

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

Social distancing in apartment blocks is hard to do, but necessary right now


Maritime matters

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Adorable therapy

Precinct Perspectives

A new perspective from Batman’s Hill

SkyPad Living Image

SkyPad Living

A chair’s perspective of vertical living in COVID-19 times

Street Art Image

Street Art

Goodbye from Blender Studios


Sustainability in a pandemic world

The District

Eat your way through our most delicious hot spots

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

We need a clear cladding policy – now!

Abby's Angle  Image

Abby's Angle

Slow down. The panic is coursing through all our veins

Docklands to cop ‘city bypass’

31 May 2016

Docklands to cop ‘city bypass’ Image

Docklanders can look forward to a lot more traffic in Wurundjeri Way, which will become a “city bypass” if the proposed Western Distributor road is built.

Under current plans for the toll road, east-bound traffic on Dynon Rd will be offered a non-tolled diversion around the west of the CBD via an extended Wurundjeri Way.

The State Government and Transurban say the Wurundjeri Way extension is designed to by-pass inner city streets and reduce traffic flow through the CBD.

“The extension of Wurundjeri Way from Dudley St to Dynon Rd will provide a bypass of the CBD. For those travelling from the inner west to destinations south of the city, the city bypass provides a more direct route and eases the pressure on Dynon Rd and north-south CBD routes including Spencer St,” a consultation document says.

The authorities conducted a consultation in Docklands on May 3 at Etihad Stadium.

Meanwhile, Melbourne councillors are finding voice to discredit the project.

At their meeting on May 17, councillors were scathing in their assessment of the damage the road would inflict on the city as a whole.

They were also upset that their officers found at least five things to like about the project.

Transport chair Cathy Oke said the project had no benefits at all.

“The impacts to the City of Melbourne are huge and this project is somewhat ridiculous,” Cr Oke said.  “We’re not seeking to have more cars coming into the City of Melbourne at all.  I can’t see how this project aligns with what we are seeking to achieve.”

Cr Rohan Leppert noted that the council and the state government were diametrically opposed in their positions.

“By my reading, our strategy calls for a decrease in car trips by 160,000 by 2030 and the Western Distributor plans for an increase in car trips to the CBD from Footscray and Dynon roads alone of 30,000,” Cr Leppert said.

Councillors were debating how to respond to a council-management prepared document which concluded: “The main anticipated effects are the potential negative impact on land through the creation of demand for car parking and storage in the central city; on public amenity and safety due to increased numbers of cars in the city, particularly in streets and areas not designed to absorb the increased traffic and where there are significant numbers of vulnerable road users; greater traffic noise; air pollution; potentially undermining conditions for walking, cycling and public transport and possible impacts on the public realm such as trees.”

Cr Arron Wood said:  “At first glance, having a huge freeway project coming into the doorstep of the world’s most liveable city isn’t looking good for us so far.”

He said he looked forward to officers speaking with the government and Transurban about ways to best mitigate the effects on the project.

Cr Wood acknowledged the desire to remove trucks from local roads in the western suburbs, but said the issue should be considered a freight problem.

“It should be solved as a freight issue and not cobbling together another freeway, which essentially dumps a whole heap of traffic on the doorstep of Melbourne.”

Cr Ken Ong advocated not speaking with the government at all.

“Our transport policy is totally ignored by the project,” he said.  “This opportunistic proposal by Transurban on a West-East approach only benefits Transurban.  It actually doesn’t benefit the city at all.”

“Why should we work with a government on a project that’s not even a stated policy before the last elections?  It’s a terrible project. It’s got all these negatives, but we want to work with them to get a better outcome? A better outcome for the city will probably not be a better outcome for Transurban.  So what do you think is going to happen?  We’ll be pissing in the wind.”

“In my view, we should tell the government ‘sorry, we don’t actually support this and we just don’t want to work with you’.”

Cr Wood and Cr Jackie Watts both said the council had been in a similar position with the ill-fated East West Link proposal.

“We do feel like we’ve been down this path before with a certain other road. And we do advocate strongly that public transport is the best way to move mass commuters around,” Cr Wood said.

“If you make it easier and quicker for people to drive their cars, then people will drive their cars.”

Cr Oke said: “While potentially I would have preferred to reject is outright, I understand that this is management’s report.”

Share on Facebook

Stay in touch with Docklands. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Docklands News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.