Columns
10 years on Image

10 years on

Finally the fog lifts on South Wharf
Read more >>

Away from the desk Image

Away from the desk

The little bent tree
Read more >>

Chamber update Image

Chamber update

Another great year
Read more >>

Docklander Image

Docklander

Hats off to you, Premier, but remember, we’ll all be watching …
Read more >>

Docklands Secrets Image

Docklands Secrets

Conflicting speeds
Read more >>

Fashion Image

Fashion

Top five street style trends
Read more >>

Business Image

Business

Golden Fleece enters a golden age
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

New Owners’ Corporation Bill reads like a “favour for mates”
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Odd couple enjoy waterside company
Read more >>

Precinct Perspectives

Yarra’s Edge - Precinct Perspective
Read more >>

SkyPad Living Image

SkyPad Living

The vertical commons
Read more >>

Street Art Image

Street Art

Goodbye from Blender Studios
Read more >>

Sustainability

Eat sustainably!
Read more >>

The District

ArtVo returns with brand new art
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Proposed changes to the Owners’ Corporation Act
Read more >>

Abby's Angle  Image

Abby's Angle

The Silly Season
Read more >>

SkyPad Living - November 2019

30 Oct 2019

The vertical commons

By Janette Corcoran 

Communal infrastructure brings people together and, by promoting a culture of reciprocity, can reduce waste – but what model might suit our vertical neighbourhoods?

Australians are well used to portrayals of our remote outback towns being self-sufficient. With a stereotypical hands-on approach, we have become used to seeing these communities ban together to create their own facilities - like sporting fields, community halls – and sometimes even grading the road that leads there!

Referred to as communal or community infrastructure, these types of facilities are well recognised as essential for the health, social wellbeing and economic prosperity of communities. This fact is noted by both our state and local governments which explicitly acknowledge community infrastructure as a cornerstone of wellbeing.

And this need for community infrastructure is also apparent in our new high-rise high-density precincts - but our needs manifest quite differently.

Unsurprisingly – and in direct contrast to our rural cousins – one of our key needs and challenges involves space, specifically, lack of and little control over.

We vertical villagers are well aware that high-rise, high-density living is synonymous with limited space and we are well versed in topics such as down-scaling, decluttering and multi-functional furniture.

However, viewed in terms of community infrastructure, our space restrictions have a more insidious side which impact on our ability to partake in the circular economy (i.e. minimising our waste).

Consider this.

The space restrictions of vertical living typically require us to give up our infrequently used equipment – like specialty tools and appliances. However, in so doing, we reduce our own ability to repair or repurpose - because if a task needs a drill or an overlocker, then there are few substitutes (contrary to my neighbour’s view of hammers!). This means we need to either pay someone else to do the repair (if there is a service available) or throw it away, thereby contributing to our growing waste levels.

Encouragingly, however, entities such as the Libraries of Things (LoT) and also specialty tool libraries are emerging.

Similar to our traditional libraries, tool libraries allow members to borrow items for gardening, sewing, cooking or carpentry. Borrowing might incur a small cost, or there may be a membership fee, or, in some cases, there may be no cost at all - and this is an example of the real sharing economy.

However, our high-density precincts share with us of the vertical villages the issue of a lack of space. As services and facilities like tool libraries require space (these tools aren’t virtual!) as well as some degree of certainty about where and when they can be accessed, has led to these services either not being set up or operating on an ad hoc basis. Add to this the wasted effort of repeatedly setting up and then dismantling operations, along with members having to store resources at their own private dwellings (spaces which are already under pressure) means that our high-density precincts are seen as poor candidates for community-managed infrastructure.

What is needed is a more creative approach to exploring options - and to start, here are two thought bubbles:

First, co-working for community groups – rather than introduce yet another co-working space for start-ups, perhaps these areas can be reoriented towards community groups (along with dedicated storage space!).

Secondly, businesses, universities and government (all who occupy our precinct) often have underutilised facilities (and equipment!). A focused look at what arrangements might be possible could lead to more than just helping people reuse and repair, it could lead to actual inter-sector engagement and a stronger community.

 

Stay in touch with Docklands. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Docklands News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.