10 years on Image

10 years on

New Southern Star revealed

Away from the desk Image

Away from the desk

The little bent tree

Docklander Image


Rapt with life in Docklands

Docklands Secrets Image

Docklands Secrets

Conflicting speeds


港区超市 疫情热点


A vote for uncertainty

Owners' Corporation Management

Performance-based alternative solutions the key to cheaper cladding replacement costs

Fashion Image


Top five street style trends

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Four steps to minimise work from home postural pain

Letters Image


An open letter to Michael and Andrew Buxton, MAB Corporation


An apple a day keeps the docks busy

Housing All Australians

Housing for all makes “good business sense”

Business Image


Making Docklands City Pharmacy a household name

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

COVID Q&A: Private renovations, cladding rectifications and nuisance from pets


Reflecting on the power of our docks

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Ty the adorable rescue

SkyPad Living Image

SkyPad Living

Do COVID-19 clouds have a silver or red lining for vertical villages?

State MP

After COVID-19: do we want to go back to “normal”?

Street Art Image

Street Art

Goodbye from Blender Studios


How fast is fast fashion?

The District

Your local delicatessen has arrived!

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Airbnb CEO “has mucked it all up”

Abby's Angle  Image

Abby's Angle

Taking the next step

August 09 Edition Cover

Lord mayoral election is a lottery

28 Mar 2018

Lord mayoral election is a lottery Image

By Shane Scanlan

Melbourne votes for a new lord mayor this month, but the winner won’t necessarily be the most popular.

Without the dominant figure of Robert Doyle in the race (with 45 per cent of the primary vote in 2016), the field is wide open and the prize is likely to be claimed by the candidate who organises the best flow of preferences.

It is even possible that the eventual winner could poll the least number of primary votes. There is a current Melbourne councillor whose team in 2016 received just 1534 votes.

Voting within the City of Melbourne is unlike any other municipality. Its special electoral system has morphed and evolved from a desire from both Labor and Coalition state governments to prevent the capital city council falling into the hands of local, parochial interests.

But is it fair? Is it democratic? Is it corrupt? It is certainly unique.

Lowest participation

To start with, Melbourne has the lowest level of voter participation. In 2016, ballots were received from only 55 per cent of eligible voters. Eligibility in Melbourne is broader than anywhere else, which goes someway to explain the poor turnout.

While the city in 2016 had an estimated residential population of 148,000, only 54,791 were on the state electoral roll.

A further 77,939 voters were on the City of Melbourne’s roll which, combined, added up to 133,801 eligible voters (before 1607 additions and 536 deletions).

The numbers show there were tens of thousands of residents who were not enrolled. And, no doubt, there were plenty of other enrolled voters who did not even know they were required to vote.

But there are also other factors to explain the poor participation rate of two years ago.

Postal woes

Does anyone maintain faith these days that a correctly-stamped item entrusted to Australia Post will reach its destination?

City of Melbourne elections are run purely as a postal ballot. And ballots have to run the postal system gauntlet twice – once from the Victorian Electoral Commission (VEC) to the voter and again on the return journey.

This system is open to routine abuse. Stories abound of theft of ballots from letter boxes on the day they arrive. And hundreds, if not thousands, are discarded (which can be harvested by others) by residents who receive mail addressed to a previously-correctly-enrolled voter.

And, because the VEC does not have matching signatures for most voters, there will always be suspicion that the ballots being received are not genuine.

On top of all this potential abuse, ballots destined for absentee landlords are routinely sent in bulk to real estate agents acting on their behalf. No audit is conducted about what happens to these ballots.

But the VEC says “there has never been a single piece of evidence provided to us” to support claims of stolen or discarded ballots.

Its director communication and engagement, Sue Lang, said the VEC had:

Worked with CrimeStoppers over two MCC elections to encourage people to dob in any such miscreants and had also taken out print ads for the same purpose;

Put posters in public housing high-rise advising that packs were coming and had hand-delivered ballot packs to management so that they could be delivered securely. Hand deliveries would also be made to Melbourne Inner City Management and to the Melbourne Law Chambers;

Had spoken on talk-back radio over the years to ask people to come forward if they knew of anyone who was stealing/completing bulk ballot papers or witnessed it happening; and

Had paid security staff to observing public housing high-rises and other potential “hot spots” when ballot packs were delivered.

Ms Lang said the VEC conducted random signature checks and knew that “in the main”, that real estate agents posted on ballots to landlords. She said the VEC knew this because of complaints from landlords who received ballots too late to vote.

“There are systems and checks in place,” she said.


Much is made of the unique situation in Melbourne, where corporations are given two votes, whereas residents are restricted to one. Supporters of this anomaly justify it on the basis of the percentage of commercial rates underpinning the council’s operations.

Critics say it just isn’t fair. But this cuts both ways. Up to two residential renters per property can apply to be added to the council roll – and they don’t even have to be Australian citizens. The only prerequisite is that they had lived at the address for a month before applications closed (March 16). No proof of occupancy is required.

Dummies and stooges

Like other Victorian municipal elections, candidates routinely enlist others to direct preferences their way.

As in the past, voters can expect to select from candidates whose sole role is to attract or block votes that may have otherwise flowed to an opponent.

The Greens are the only major political party to officially endorse candidates in local government elections. Labor and Liberal interests are unofficial. But they are there in the mix.

Motivations of parties and candidates vary. For Labor, blocking Greens influence in the inner city is high on the list. Last time around, Robert Doyle was supported by Labor as a brake on Greens’ ambition.

The successful candidate will be the one who does the best preference deals. For the voters and the candidates, it’s a lottery.

Share on Facebook

Stay in touch with Docklands. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Docklands News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.