Columns
10 years on Image

10 years on

Yarra’s Edge is at last reconnected with the city
Read more >>

Away from the desk Image

Away from the desk

The little bent tree
Read more >>

Chamber update Image

Chamber update

Mental health during times of COVID-19
Read more >>

Docklander Image

Docklander

Learning to fend in a foreign city
Read more >>

Docklands Secrets Image

Docklands Secrets

Conflicting speeds
Read more >>

Chinese

商场开发计划 需要更多改进
Read more >>

Critic

A vote for uncertainty
Read more >>

Owners' Corporation Management

The top three benefits of virtual owners’ corporation meetings
Read more >>

Fashion Image

Fashion

Top five street style trends
Read more >>

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Get “Back on Track” this World Spine Day
Read more >>

Letters Image

Letters

Docklands images
Read more >>

History

A fleeting glance
Read more >>

Housing All Australians

Housing vulnerable Australians means making tough choices
Read more >>

Business Image

Business

LivMate: the new technology helping a post-COVID Docklands
Read more >>

Maritime

Opening up Melbourne’s waterways
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

Ty the adorable rescue
Read more >>

SkyPad Living Image

SkyPad Living

Making residential living a council election priority
Read more >>

Precinct Perspectives

Reactivating NewQuay will require a team effort
Read more >>

State MP

After COVID-19: do we want to go back to “normal”?
Read more >>

Street Art Image

Street Art

Goodbye from Blender Studios
Read more >>

Sustainability

How fast is fast fashion?
Read more >>

The District

Your local delicatessen has arrived!
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Short-stays will endanger COVID recovery
Read more >>

Abby's Angle  Image

Abby's Angle

Learning forgiveness through lockdown
Read more >>

Editions
August 09 Edition Cover

District plans need more work

30 Sep 2020

District plans need more work Image

By Meg Hill and Sean Car

The City of Melbourne has invited the developers of The District Docklands AsheMorgan to revise its proposal for a new mixed-use development after councillors unanimously objected to a number of aspects of the plans last month.

AsheMorgan is seeking approval from Minister for Planning Richard Wynne for an addendum to the Waterfront City East Development Plan 2003 (WFCDP), which would allow for a new mixed-use precinct at 50-94 Waterfront Way and 2-16 Little Docklands Drive.

The matter went before councillors at the Future Melbourne Committee (FMC) meeting on September 15 where AsheMorgan development director Andrew Whiteside expressed his disappointment in the “narrative” of the recommendation by the council’s planning officers.

While some councillors shared Mr Whiteside’s frustration in the nature of the “outdated” development plans for Waterfront City East, all unanimously objected to the application, with chair of planning Cr Nicholas Reece describing it as “too fortress-like”.

In the council’s delegate report, officers acknowledged that the site’s layout was structured around the “constraint” of the retained multi-storey car park, which occupies more than a third of the site. However, they stated that the proposed layout with its undercroft vehicle access and raised pedestrianised public realm provided an “unacceptable outcome”.

The six-stage plans, which include a mix of retail, office and residential buildings ranging between 40 and 80 metres in height, would include a 5.4 metre raised deck over a new Waterfront Lane “through link”. The plans also include an elevated public communal space situated 23 metres above ground level on the rooftop of the existing car park.

Cr Reece said that while AsheMorgan had improved the built form and fabric of The District and activated the surrounding precinct in a “clever way”, there were too many issues with the application that needed to be resolved.

“There are some significant positive aspects to it,” he said.

“That said, there are some issues which have been raised in the officers’ report which I do think need to be addressed, in particular the ensuring of a safe well-used public realm by avoiding raised decks and undercroft.”

“The preference in this part [raised decks] would be the activation of the accessible ground level, especially given its proximity to the water. While using raised decks and rooftops is certainly something we can see in other parts of the city, it’s very much a second-best solution to activating the ground plane.”

“In short, there is too much about this proposal which does not allow this site to connect and speak to the outside world. It’s too fortress-like with 60-metre street walls. We want a fully open and permeable proposal.”

The council’s planning officers also expressed concerns that the proposed built form would create negative wind impacts and overshadowing of public space and the new Docklands Primary School site.

Officers also noted that the proposal did not include any commitment to affordable housing and argued that a provision of “at least five per cent” be incorporated as part of the project’s residential component.

AsheMorgan development director Andrew Whiteside said he was disappointed in the “late stage” of the council’s recommendations and complained that planning officers had approached the application as a planning permit rather than a development plan.

“The development plan overlay is nearly 20 years old now and it doesn’t reflect where we’re at and where we need to go next, so unlike the previous matters you’ve dealt with tonight, we’re not seeking a planning permit for this development,” he said.

“This is an important point because many of the comments by officers are concerned with the detail, normally dealt with in the planning permit stages, such as wind impacts, assessment of detailed design, signage, etc.”

The City of Melbourne’s director of planning and building Evan Counsel responded to Mr Whiteside’s claims, stating that the council had signalled “in principle support for intensification of development on the site” but outlined elements that needed to be resolved before the detailed planning permit stage.

“We think these are elements that need to be resolved before the addendum to the development plan can be approved,” he said.

While he agreed with the Development Plan for the precinct needed updating, deputy chair of planning Cr Rohan Leppert described the outcome of the council’s decision as a “good faith solution”.

“This is a really large and important strategic site in Docklands,” he said. “Whenever you have a development plan overlay (DPO), and I agree with the applicant that we need a new one, we need to come to an arrangement as to what that fine-grain plan looks like.”

“We have to accept in the Docklands those controls are far and few between. DPO mechanisms provide developers in Docklands with extraordinary flexibility.”

“We can still get to a conclusion but we need to keep pushing further. This is a good faith solution.”

Lord Mayor Sally Capp said while she was disappointed that an agreement couldn’t be arrived at yet, activation at the ground level and enhancing the waterfront in Docklands was “absolutely paramount”.

“Ashe Morgan really needs to be supported. It has been incredibly active and proactive. I know we have common goals and it’s how we go about achieving them,” the Lord Mayor said.

Cr Beverley Pinder echoed the Lord Mayor’s support of AsheMorgan.

“It doesn’t seem like we have given them [AsheMorgan] a very good planning experience at all,” she said.

“I urge officers to advance discussions. I hope Docklands can get past this.” •

Share on Facebook

Stay in touch with Docklands. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Docklands News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.