Columns
10 years on Image

10 years on

March 2009, Issue 40
Read more >>

Away from the desk Image

Away from the desk

The little bent tree
Read more >>

Chamber update Image

Chamber update

The Summer Campaign
Read more >>

Docklander Image

Docklander

Mona’s enjoying her upside down life
Read more >>

Docklands Secrets Image

Docklands Secrets

Politician disrespects us
Read more >>

Fashion Image

Fashion

Top five street style trends
Read more >>

Health and Wellbeing Image

Health and Wellbeing

Flexibility, mobility and wellbeing
Read more >>

Letters Image

Letters

Well done Sam
Read more >>

New Businesses Image

New Businesses

70 years later, family business still suits
Read more >>

Owners Corporation Law Image

Owners Corporation Law

Boom, boom, bust and out -
Read more >>

Pets Corner Image

Pets Corner

She’s the boss, and I like it!
Read more >>

SkyPad Living Image

SkyPad Living

Energy vulnerable vertical villages?
Read more >>

Street Art Image

Street Art

Goodbye from Blender Studios
Read more >>

We Live Here Image

We Live Here

Cladding, short-stays and rooming
Read more >>

We Live Here - Dec 16 / Jan 17

06 Dec 2016

Big win for residents in parliamentary vote

The Owners Corporation Amendment (Short Stay Accommodation) Bill 2016 has been referred back to the Environment and Planning Committee for inquiry.

The parliamentary vote has stopped the Victorian Government from introducing a Bill that would only benefit commercial short-stay operators.

This is a huge win for the We Live Here movement which has been working tirelessly with politicians from all sides of Parliament to achieve this outcome.

A special thank-you to David Davis, Shadow Minister for Planning, Russell Northe, Shadow Minister for Consumer Affairs, along with Nina Springle from the Greens and Fiona Patten from the Sex Party who all supported the We Live Here movement on this issue.

The Legislative Council vote

On November 8, the Legislative Council voted overwhelmingly to block the Bill and open up the opportunity for community and stakeholder consultation – consultation that the government should have offered from the outset.

Mr O’Donohue, the Liberal Member for Eastern Victoria, proposed a motion to send the Bill to the Committee for Environment and Planning for inquiry and report, on the grounds of inadequate community and stakeholder consultation.

The Labor Government shocked Victorian apartment owners on May 24, 2016 when, with no prior notice given, it introduced the Bill in the Lower House through the former Consumer Affairs Minister Jane Garrett.

The decision by the Legislative Council now prevents this Bill from passing into law, and represents a victory in the on-going push by community groups to ensure that short-term commercial accommodation becomes a regulated industry.

The inquiry by the Committee for Environment and Planning must complete its report by March 7 next year and table it with the Legislative Committee for further debate.

In Parliament, Mr Davis said: “It [short-stay accommodation] is a very important part of our tourism industry, but it is an area where there needs to be better regulations. Untrammelled access can lead to very poor lifestyle and living outcomes ...”

Speaking on behalf of the Sex Party and in support of the blocking of the passage of the Bill, Ms Fiona Patten MP said the vote was a wake-up call for the government to realise the benefit of “clear and effective regulation” of commercial short-stays.

Greens MP Nina Springle expressed the concerns of residents who “foot the bill” for the increased costs caused by the commercial short-stay industry. Apartment buildings “were not designed as hotels” she told Parliament.

Members of the We Live Here movement were present in Parliament to witness the debate having canvassed the support of political parties on either side of the divide including the crossbenchers.

Barbara Francis, a director of We Live Here said: “We are very pleased with this decision, and are very proud to represent the nearly one million residents in apartment buildings in Victoria in continuing to advocate for serious regulation of the commercial short-stay industry.”

“We have tried to schedule meetings with the Consumer Affairs Minister(s) and advisers on many occasions, but they were not interested in engaging with residents and owners.”

“Finally, by the blocking of this Bill and sending it back to the drawing board, we will have an opportunity to have our voice heard. The onus is now on the Labor Government to engage with the community, and this time to get the balance right with any proposed legislation.”

Council elections

Prior to the election all 59 candidates were sent a survey by We Live Here to canvas their opinions on the issue of commercial short stays.

An excellent response of almost 86 per cent was received and all but one of the teams supported the regulation of short stays in residential buildings. The one exception was the team headed by former councillor Stephen Mayne who subsequently failed in his re-election bid.

It appears that ex-councillor Mayne, the self-proclaimed most pro-development former councillor, paid the price for not listening to concerns raised by us and other resident groups.

He has since declared that he has learned his lesson, that to ignore residents groups is a good way to get dumped off council!

The final make-up of the council is not yet known but we look forward to working with them all on issues involving residents in the City of Melbourne.

Good Cycles container in Harbour Esplanade

We Live Here has received many complaints about the Good Cycles container which suddenly appeared in Harbour Esplanade.

Dismay, bewilderment, mind-boggling and ridiculous are just some of the comments and views expressed about Places Victoria’s decision to place the container in its current location. 

Others have expressed doubt that Places Victoria even inspected the site beforehand.

The container in its current location badly blocks the street level water views. This is recognised as being vital to Melbourne and Docklands as stated in Places Victoria “Harbour Esplanade Master Plan”.

The issue may be easily resolved by shifting the container further south so as not to impede the beautiful water views.

Cow Up a Tree

We Live Here has also received many comments about the siting of the cafe in front of the Cow Up a Tree, now almost out of sight to visitors on the “talking trams” and to passers-by.

Surely anyone involved could see the issue when erecting the cafe. Why has nothing been done to either relocate the café or the “cow” so that the iconic sculpture can be viewed by all.

It can’t be that difficult, can it? And who makes these absurd decisions?

You can support the We Live Here movement by registering on our website at welivehere.net.

Contributions are also welcome and can be made online. 

Stay in touch with Docklands. Subscribe to FREE monthly e-Newspaper.

You must be registered with Docklands News to be able to post comments.
To register, please click here.

Docklands is Beautiful